linux-kernel - Re: [linux-next] make s5p64x0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:54:36 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next] make  s5p64x0_defconfig build error

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:30:13AM +0200, Denis Kuzmenko wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 09:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:32:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:57:10AM +0000, Axel Lin wrote:
> > So... unless things change, we can expect Gemini, almost all Samsung
> > stuff, shmobile, vt8500, and Telechips TCC8k to be at least broken at
> > the next merge window.
> 
> Mini2440 march (s3c24xx platform) is not broken in v3.2-rc5. Does that
> mean that s3c24xx is untouched by this issue or this means that I should
> use linux-next?

Most of the completed changes are in linux-next for the restart changes.
I have some additional commits (which were posted to the list as the 3rd
sub-series), which I'm not planning to submit in their current form -
they move things _towards_ sorting out the samsung stuff, but they're
all incomplete.  These continue to be a part of my 'reset' branch.

Basically, the comments in the commit summary line marked with XXX need
addressing - and folk need to get out of the habbit of thinking "it's
an include file, it must go into somewhere called 'include'."  Instead,
put includes local to a set of files in a directory in that same
directory.

Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sun Nov 6 16:22:23 2011 +0000

    ARM: restart: plat-samsung: remove plat/reset.h and s5p_reset_hook

    Now that s5p_reset_hook is unused, we can get rid of plat/reset.h and
    the s5p_reset_hook code in plat/system-reset.h.

    Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>

Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sun Nov 6 16:20:11 2011 +0000

    ARM: restart: s5pv210: use new restart hook XXX WIP XXX WHY IS THERE NO LOCAL HEADERS IN arch/arm/mach-exynos4 XXX

    Hook these platforms restart code into the new restart hook rather
    than using arch_reset().

    Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>

Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sun Nov 6 13:24:20 2011 +0000

    ARM: restart: exynos4: use new restart hook XXX WIP XXX WHY IS THERE NO LOCAL HEADERS IN arch/arm/mach-exynos4 XXX

    Hook these platforms restart code into the new restart hook rather
    than using arch_reset().

    Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/