linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:44:11 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	glommer@...allels.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from
 memcontrol.c

From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:11:36 +0400

> How about the following patch then ? I am keeping protocols that has
> the cgroup stuff on in a separate list, that can be protected by a
> mutex. Therefore we can allocate without going into troubles.

This is a significantly better approach, please test and submit this
patch formally.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/