linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86, mce: handle "action required" errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:56:44 +0800
From:	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86, mce: handle "action required" errors

于 2011/12/15 5:30, Tony Luck 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Chen Gong<gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>  wrote:
>>> -       if (kill_it&&    tolerant<    3)
>>>
>>> +       if (worst != MCE_AR_SEVERITY&&    kill_it&&    tolerant<    3)
>>>                 force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
>>
>>
>> I think here it should add more comments to clarify why not killing *AR*
>> case.
>> Such as: "for SRAR errors, such as DCU/IFU error, on affected logical
>> processors, it is reasonable that RIPV is 0."
>
> I'll look at this - the reason to not kill for AR is that we want to
> try to recover
> first (e.g. page could be re-read from disk into a different physical page).
> In some cases we can recover transparently to the application.

Oh, yes, these reasons are very important why not killing *AR* events. But my
point is in a *AR* supported environment, "kill_it" should not be true like
below:
         if (!(m.mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV))
                 kill_it = 1;

the reason is what I said before. But at that time the worst severity hasn't
been determined so we have to wati until it is out.

anyway, it is an interesting coincidence, isn't it? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/