linux-kernel - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] device_isolation: Support isolation on POWER p7ioc (IODA) bridges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:27:21 +1100
From:	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	chrisw@...hat.com, aik@...abs.ru, joerg.roedel@....com,
	agraf@...e.de, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, B08248@...escale.com,
	alex.williamson@...hat.com, scottwood@...escale.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] device_isolation: Support isolation on
 POWER p7ioc (IODA) bridges

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:48:38PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 17:08 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > This patch adds code to the code for the powernv platform to create
> > and populate isolation groups on hardware using the p7ioc (aka IODA) PCI host
> > bridge used on some IBM POWER systems.
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> > index 0cdc8302..6df632e 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> > @@ -861,6 +862,9 @@ static void __devinit pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe,
> >  		set_iommu_table_base(&dev->dev, &pe->tce32_table);
> >  		if (dev->subordinate)
> >  			pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(pe, dev->subordinate);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEVICE_ISOLATION
> > +		device_isolation_dev_add(&pe->di_group, &dev->dev);
> > +#endif
> 
> You already have a nop version of that in device_isolation.h, so the
> ifdef is not required AFAICS.

Alas, this is not true, since the pe->di_group member will not exist
if !CONFIG_DEVICE_ISOLATION.  And the stub is an inline, not a macro.

The stubs probably can be fine tuned to avoid ifdefs in more places.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)