linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Pass name instead of device to pin_config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 23:27:10 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Pass name instead of device to pin_config_*

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:

> Obtaining a "struct pinctrl_dev *" is difficult for code not directly
> related to the pinctrl subsystem. However, the device name of the pinctrl
> device is fairly well known. So, modify pin_config_*() to take the device
> name instead of the "struct pinctrl_dev *".
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>

Thanks Stephen, excellent, both applied.

I had to fix it up a bit to match the other
refactoring patch I made so check the result in my tree or -next.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/