linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] KVM: MMU: combine unsync and unsync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:25:06 +0900
From:	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] KVM: MMU: combine unsync and unsync_children

About naming issues in the kvm mmu code.

Not restricted to your patch series, so please take as a suggestion
for the future.

(2011/12/16 19:13), Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> +static bool sp_is_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> +{
> +	return sp->role.level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL&&  sp->unsync;
> +}

is_unsync_sp() is more consistent with others?
	e.g. is_large_pte(), is_writable_pte(), is_last_spte()


	Takuya

> +
> +static unsigned int sp_unsync_children_num(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> +{
> +	unsigned int num = 0;
> +
> +	if (sp->role.level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> +		num = sp->unsync_children;
> +
> +	return num;
> +}
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/