| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:32:41 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats
On Wed 14-12-11 14:36:25, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > This looks all inherently racy (which doesn't matter much as you suggest)
> > so I just wanted to suggest that if you used per-cpu counters you'd get
> > race-free and faster code at the cost of larger data structures and using
> > percpu_counter_add() instead of ++ (which doesn't seem like a big
> > complication to me).
>
> OK, here is the incremental patch to use per-cpu counters :)
Thanks! This looks better. I just thought you would use per-cpu counters
as defined in include/linux/percpu_counter.h and are used e.g. by bdi
stats. This is more standard for statistics in the kernel than using
per-cpu variables directly.
Honza
> ---
> mm/readahead.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/readahead.c 2011-12-14 09:50:37.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/readahead.c 2011-12-14 14:16:15.000000000 +0800
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum ra_account {
> RA_ACCOUNT_MAX,
> };
>
> -static unsigned long ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_MAX][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX];
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long[RA_PATTERN_ALL][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX], ra_stat);
>
> static void readahead_stats(struct address_space *mapping,
> pgoff_t offset,
> @@ -83,38 +83,62 @@ static void readahead_stats(struct addre
> {
> pgoff_t eof = ((i_size_read(mapping->host)-1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + 1;
>
> -recount:
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT]++;
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SIZE] += size;
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ASYNC_SIZE] += async_size;
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ACTUAL] += actual;
> + preempt_disable();
> +
> + __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT]);
> + __this_cpu_add(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SIZE], size);
> + __this_cpu_add(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ASYNC_SIZE], async_size);
> + __this_cpu_add(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_ACTUAL], actual);
>
> if (start + size >= eof)
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_EOF]++;
> + __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_EOF]);
> if (actual < size)
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_CACHE_HIT]++;
> + __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_CACHE_HIT]);
>
> if (actual) {
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_IOCOUNT]++;
> + __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_IOCOUNT]);
>
> if (start <= offset && offset < start + size)
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SYNC]++;
> + __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_SYNC]);
>
> if (for_mmap)
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_MMAP]++;
> + __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_MMAP]);
> if (for_metadata)
> - ra_stats[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_METADATA]++;
> + __this_cpu_inc(ra_stat[pattern][RA_ACCOUNT_METADATA]);
> }
>
> - if (pattern != RA_PATTERN_ALL) {
> - pattern = RA_PATTERN_ALL;
> - goto recount;
> - }
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> +
> +static void ra_stats_clear(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + for (i = 0; i < RA_PATTERN_ALL; i++)
> + for (j = 0; j < RA_ACCOUNT_MAX; j++)
> + per_cpu(ra_stat[i][j], cpu) = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ra_stats_sum(unsigned long ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_MAX][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX])
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + for (i = 0; i < RA_PATTERN_ALL; i++)
> + for (j = 0; j < RA_ACCOUNT_MAX; j++) {
> + unsigned long n = per_cpu(ra_stat[i][j], cpu);
> + ra_stats[i][j] += n;
> + ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_ALL][j] += n;
> + }
> }
>
> static int readahead_stats_show(struct seq_file *s, void *_)
> {
> unsigned long i;
> + unsigned long ra_stats[RA_PATTERN_MAX][RA_ACCOUNT_MAX];
>
> seq_printf(s,
> "%-10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s %10s\n",
> @@ -122,6 +146,9 @@ static int readahead_stats_show(struct s
> "io", "sync_io", "mmap_io", "meta_io",
> "size", "async_size", "io_size");
>
> + memset(ra_stats, 0, sizeof(ra_stats));
> + ra_stats_sum(ra_stats);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < RA_PATTERN_MAX; i++) {
> unsigned long count = ra_stats[i][RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT];
> unsigned long iocount = ra_stats[i][RA_ACCOUNT_IOCOUNT];
> @@ -159,7 +186,7 @@ static int readahead_stats_open(struct i
> static ssize_t readahead_stats_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> size_t size, loff_t *offset)
> {
> - memset(ra_stats, 0, sizeof(ra_stats));
> + ra_stats_clear();
> return size;
> }
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists