linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:21:26 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"Alex\,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm\@kvack.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413

Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de> writes:

> On 2011.11.21 at 17:34 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> On 2011.11.21 at 17:10 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> > On 2011.11.21 at 16:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > > Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 16:36 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf a écrit :
>> > > > On 2011.11.21 at 15:16 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > > > > Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 14:15 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf a écrit :
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > > I've enabled CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON and this is what happend:
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Please continue to provide more samples.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > There is something wrong somewhere, but where exactly, its hard to say.
>> > > > 
>> > > > New sample. This one points to lib/idr.c:
>> > > > 
>> > > > =============================================================================
>> > > > BUG idr_layer_cache: Poison overwritten
>> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > 
>> > > Thanks, could you now add "CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y" in your config as
>> > > well ?
>> > 
>> > Sure. This one happend with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y:
>> > 
>> > =============================================================================
>> > BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> And sometimes this one that I've reported earlier already:
>> 
>> (see: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1215023 )
>> 
>>  ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>  WARNING: at fs/sysfs/sysfs.h:195 sysfs_get_inode+0x136/0x140()
>>  Hardware name: System Product Name
>>  Pid: 1876, comm: slabinfo Not tainted 3.2.0-rc2-00274-g6fe4c6d #72
>>  Call Trace:
>>  [<ffffffff8106cac5>] warn_slowpath_common+0x75/0xb0
>>  [<ffffffff8106cbc5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
>>  [<ffffffff81163236>] sysfs_get_inode+0x136/0x140
>>  [<ffffffff81164cef>] sysfs_lookup+0x6f/0x110
>>  [<ffffffff811173f9>] d_alloc_and_lookup+0x39/0x80
>>  [<ffffffff81118774>] do_lookup+0x294/0x3a0
>>  [<ffffffff8111798a>] ? inode_permission+0x7a/0xb0
>>  [<ffffffff8111a3f7>] do_last.isra.46+0x137/0x7f0
>>  [<ffffffff8111ab76>] path_openat+0xc6/0x370
>>  [<ffffffff81117606>] ? getname_flags+0x36/0x230
>>  [<ffffffff810ec852>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x192/0x290
>>  [<ffffffff8111ae5c>] do_filp_open+0x3c/0x90
>>  [<ffffffff81127c8c>] ? alloc_fd+0xdc/0x120
>>  [<ffffffff8110ce77>] do_sys_open+0xe7/0x1c0
>>  [<ffffffff8110cf6b>] sys_open+0x1b/0x20
>>  [<ffffffff814ccb7b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>  ---[ end trace b1377eb8b131d37d ]---
>
> Hm, the "sysfs: use rb-tree" thing hit again during boot. Could this be
> the root cause of this all?
>
> I wrote down the following:
>
> RIP : rb_next
>
> Trace:
>  sysfs_dir_pos
>  sysfs_readdir
>  ? sys_ioctl
>  vfs_readdir
>  sys_getdents

Thanks for reporting this.

Has this by any chance been resolved or stopped happening?

This looks for all of the world like something is stomping your sysfs
dirents.   I haven't seen anyone else complaining so this seems like the
problem is unique to your configuration.  Which suggests that it is not
sysfs itself that is wrong.

I have been through the code a time or two and I haven't seen anything
obviously wrong.  Everything that sysfs does is protected by the
sysfs_mutex so the locking is very very simple.

My best guess of why now is that the rbtree code make a sysfs dirent
48 bytes larger.  And so it is much more exposed to these kinds of
problems.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/