linux-kernel - Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 2/2] security: Yama LSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:52:34 +1100 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc:	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 2/2] security: Yama LSM

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Kees Cook wrote:

> Hi James,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:33:10AM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA
> > > +	ns->ptrace_scope = parent_pid_ns->ptrace_scope;
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > 
> > I'd like to see this implemented as an LSM hook, something like 
> > security_ptrace_set_scope().
> 
> I must be dense, but I fail to understand the purpose of this. The "ptrace
> scope" implemented by Yama is a sysctl, not an system interface. I don't
> understand why (or where) other LSMs would want to catch changing this.
> Can you explain what you're looking for in more detail?
> 

We should not see YAMA-specific code in the core kernel.  However you do 
it, the above should happen in LSM.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/