| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:50:59 +1030 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] module_param: make bool parameters really bool (core code) On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:58:30 -0800, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:43:24PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In > > fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy > > trick. > > > > It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version > > it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> > > For the rcutorture component: > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Given that this portion of the patch is self-sufficient, I have queued > the rcutorture portion of this patch with your signed-off-by, which I > can push for either 3.3 or 3.4 (default is most likely 3.4). Of course, > if you would prefer some other approach, please let me know. Nope, more than happy. Have removed it from my patch. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists