| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:28:18 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, vipulkumar.samar@...com,
bhavna.yadav@...com, bhupesh.sharma@...com,
armando.visconti@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vipin.kumar@...com, shiraz.hashim@...com, Amit.VIRDI@...com,
mirko.gardi@...com, deepak.sikri@...com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Vincenzo.FRASCINO@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Add support for device_prep_dma_sg
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:17 +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Memory to memory copy with scatter gather option has been implemented in
> this patch. Driver can manage even if number of nodes in src and dst
> list is different.
The logic looks okay, but it would be great if we could split this
prepare here.
Possibly later when we have multiple such cases we can create templates
for parsing the non linear sg list and create linear lists from it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> index 96b2750..c1c78c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c
> @@ -729,6 +729,140 @@ err_desc_get:
> }
>
> static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> +dwc_prep_dma_sg(struct dma_chan *chan,
> + struct scatterlist *dsgl, unsigned int dst_nents,
> + struct scatterlist *ssgl, unsigned int src_nents,
> + unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct dw_dma_chan *dwc = to_dw_dma_chan(chan);
> + struct dw_desc *desc;
> + struct dw_desc *first;
> + struct dw_desc *prev;
> + size_t xfer_count;
> + size_t offset;
> + unsigned int src_width;
> + unsigned int dst_width;
> + u32 ctllo;
> + struct scatterlist *dsg, *ssg;
> + dma_addr_t src = 0, dst = 0;
> + unsigned int slen = 0, dlen = 0, total_len = 0;
> + unsigned int i, nents, len = 0, incs, si = 0, di = 0;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!src_nents))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!dst_nents))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + prev = first = NULL;
> +
> + dsg = dsgl;
> + ssg = ssgl;
> + nents = max(src_nents, dst_nents);
shouldn't you validate if total src sg length and dstn sg lengths are
same here?
> +
> + if (nents == src_nents)
> + incs = true;
> + else
> + incs = false;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nents;) {
> + if (!slen) {
> + src = sg_dma_address(ssg);
> + slen = sg_dma_len(ssg);
> + ssg = sg_next(ssg);
> + if (!ssg && si < src_nents - 1)
> + goto err_sg_len;
> + si++;
> + } else
> + src += len;
> +
> + if (!dlen) {
> + dst = sg_dma_address(dsg);
> + dlen = sg_dma_len(dsg);
> + dsg = sg_next(dsg);
> + if (!dsg && di < dst_nents - 1)
> + goto err_sg_len;
this could be made better lokking by using helpers
> + di++;
> + } else
> + dst += len;
> +
> + if (incs)
> + i = si;
> + else
> + i = di;
> + len = min(slen, dlen);
> + slen -= len;
> + dlen -= len;
> +
> + if (!((src | dst | len) & 7))
> + src_width = dst_width = 3;
> + else if (!((src | dst | len) & 3))
> + src_width = dst_width = 2;
> + else if (!((src | dst | len) & 1))
> + src_width = dst_width = 1;
> + else
> + src_width = dst_width = 0;
how about putting this is get_me_the_length()
> +
> + ctllo = DWC_DEFAULT_CTLLO(chan->private)
> + | DWC_CTLL_DST_WIDTH(dst_width)
> + | DWC_CTLL_SRC_WIDTH(src_width)
> + | DWC_CTLL_DST_INC
> + | DWC_CTLL_SRC_INC
> + | DWC_CTLL_FC_M2M;
> +
> + offset = 0;
> + while ((len - offset) > 0) {
> +
> + xfer_count = min_t(size_t, (len - offset) >> dst_width,
> + DWC_MAX_COUNT);
> +
> + desc = dwc_desc_get(dwc);
> + if (!desc)
> + goto err_desc_get;
> +
> + desc->lli.sar = src + offset;
> + desc->lli.dar = dst + offset;
> + desc->lli.ctllo = ctllo;
> + desc->lli.ctlhi = xfer_count;
> +
> + if (!first) {
> + first = desc;
> + } else {
> + prev->lli.llp = desc->txd.phys;
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(chan2parent(chan),
> + prev->txd.phys,
> + sizeof(prev->lli),
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + list_add_tail(&desc->desc_node,
> + &first->tx_list);
> + }
> + prev = desc;
> + offset += xfer_count << dst_width;
> + }
> + total_len += len;
> + }
> +
> + if (flags & DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT)
> + /* Trigger interrupt after last block */
> + prev->lli.ctllo |= DWC_CTLL_INT_EN;
> +
> + prev->lli.llp = 0;
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(chan2parent(chan),
> + prev->txd.phys, sizeof(prev->lli),
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +
> + first->txd.flags = flags;
> + first->len = total_len;
> +
> + return &first->txd;
> +
> +err_sg_len:
> +err_desc_get:
> + dwc_desc_put(dwc, first);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> dwc_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> unsigned long flags)
> @@ -1471,6 +1605,7 @@ static int __init dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dw->dma.device_free_chan_resources = dwc_free_chan_resources;
>
> dw->dma.device_prep_dma_memcpy = dwc_prep_dma_memcpy;
> + dw->dma.device_prep_dma_sg = dwc_prep_dma_sg;
>
> dw->dma.device_prep_slave_sg = dwc_prep_slave_sg;
> dw->dma.device_control = dwc_control;
> --
> 1.7.2.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists