[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 13:47:27 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc: Virtualization List <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] virtio: net: Add freeze, restore handlers to
support S4
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 03:08:19PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> >
> > > + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL))
> > > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> >
> > This needs to be switched to non reentrant wq too?
>
> Subsequent invocations could create problems? Note that this will be
> the first item to be queued in the workqueue for the refill work.
>
> Amit
See recent patches on net-next.
We switched other calls to a non reentrant wq so I think same
reasoning applies there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists