linux-kernel - Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:18:01 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	haiyangz@...rosoft.com, hjanssen@...rosoft.com,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Jorge Bastos <mysql.jorge@...imal.pt>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Subject: Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
>>
>> Just clarifying not all of commit fb88c2b, but only the
>> security_old_inode_init_security() hunk.
>
> Agreed.
>
> And yep, it's ugly :-\

Ok, applied - along with another last-minute fix - and pushed out.

Can everybody please test and double-check that what I applied was
what everybody agrees is the RightThing(tm)? I really wanted to do 3.2
today, but both of those commits are of the "please double-check"
kind, so..

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/