lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:31:56 -0500 From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> To: linux-mm@...ck.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, hughd@...gle.com, aarcange@...hat.com Subject: [PATCH -mm 0/2] kswapd vs compaction improvements Running a kernel with compaction enabled with some memory pressure has caused my system to run into all kinds of trouble. One of the more obvious problems is that while kswapd does not try to free contiguous pages when CONFIG_COMPACTION is enabled, it does continue reclaiming until enough contiguous pages have become available. This can lead to enormous swap storms, where lots of memory is freed and a fair amount of the working set can end up in swap. A second problem is that memory compaction currently does nothing for network allocations in the receive path, for eg. jumbo frames, because those are done in interrupt context. In the past we have tried to have kswapd invoke memory compaction, but it used too much CPU time. The second patch in this series has kswapd invoke compaction very carefully, taking in account the desired page order, as well as zone->compaction_deferred. I have tested these patches on my system, and things seem to behave well. Any tests and reviews would be appreciated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists