linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/06] MFD: DA9052/53 MFD core module v9 Added ADC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:43:30 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@...tcummins.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dajun <dajun.chen@...semi.com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/06] MFD: DA9052/53 MFD core module v9 Added ADC
	support

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:50:30AM +0000, Ashish Jangam wrote:

> >>This is patch 2/6 - where are patches 1 and 3-6?

> Patch 1 and 3-6 are already ACK'ed and got merged.
> Since patch 2/6 was not merged therefore got re-submitted.

You're not understanding the purpose of the numbering at all here.  The
numbering is there so that people know what order the patches being sent
together come in.  If a patch has been sent before as part of a series
that's totally irrelevant to a further submission.

If you label the patch as part of a series like this then you're saying
that there's a patch 1 that this depends on and is needed for this to be
applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/