linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] Security subsystem updates for 3.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:38:04 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	"Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Security subsystem updates for 3.3

> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:35 PM, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> >>> And "DIGSIG" is really a horrible config name. Did somebody run out of
> >>> letters suddenly? Is there some global letter shortage that I haven't
> >>> been told of and that we should do something about?
> >>
> >> Any objections to DIGITAL_SIGNATURE_API ?
> >
> > Sounds much better. Slightly more typing, but CONFIG_DIGSIG really
> > didn't tell me anything and sounded like some odd new device to me.
> >
> >                          Linus
> 
> Would just DIGITAL_SIGNATURE be enough?

Actually, "CONFIG_SIGNATURE" should be enough.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/