linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:04:08 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: use bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear()

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:55:08 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:11:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:09:38 -0500
> > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Did you test this patch with a large amount of minors?
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry I didn't do runtime test.
> > > 
> > > Please do.
> > 
> > The poor guy probably doesn't know how to test it and surely it would
> > be quite a lot of work for him to do so.
> > 
> > Overall, it would be much more efficient if the tester of this code is
> > someone who is set up to easily apply the patch and test it.  ie: the
> > code maintainer(s).
> 
> <grins>
> 
> This patch aside - Andrew how do you deal with a large amount of patches
> and make sure they are tested?

Not very well :(

> Is there a weekly Test Tuesday where you 
> kick off your automated tests and dilligently look for any variations?
> Or is it more of compile the kernel with X features and run it for a week
> doing normal (and abnormal!) things to see if it falls over?

I build all the patches I have along with all of linux-next and boot
the thing, then use the resulting kernel for a few hours compilation
testing, then shove it all into linux-next where I naively hope that
someone else is testing things.

The coverage which is obtained this way is pretty poor.  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/