linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:59:21 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Wells <kevin.wells@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 06:57:57PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> One of the GPIO names in drivers/gpio/gpio-lpc32xx.c
> was bad. Renaming gpi000 -> gpio00
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>

Since you are modifying LPC32xx :) Which kernel version do you run? I
was trying to get a board up with 3.0 (not booting) and 3.3-rc1 (build
breakage). I even thought about removing that mach, since vital parts
seem to be missing (Net, NAND) or broken. So, I am interested if there
are still users.

CCing Kevin Wells, too: Any plans from NXP?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)