lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:39:53 +0900 From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> To: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com> Cc: Saugata Das <saugata.das@...aro.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device >> > - Add a variable member in mmc_host for minimum number of packed entries. >> > This value can be overridden by host. >> Ah.. Okay~ I clearly understand about two queston. >> Totally, Looks good to me. >> Thanks for your reply. >> And I heard that packed cmd is not good while reading small chunk, >> If so, I want to use packed write cmd not read cmd. >> Can I use packed only packed write cmd by seperating >> MMC_CAP2_PACKED_READ_CMD and MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WRITE_CMD ? > Do you think this separate use is common? > Let me consider this more. It is just my idea on user side. if we can select packed read/write set, I believe that we can optmize performance accoding to own's environment. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists