linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: android: binder: Add some error checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:52:28 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Christopher Lais <chris+android@...thought.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: android: binder: Add some error checks

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:22:08AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:56:20PM -0800, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> > - Add a mutex to protect against two processes mmapping the
> >   same binder_proc.
> > - After locking mmap_sem, check that the vma we want to access
> >   (still) points to the same mm_struct.
> > - Use proc->tsk instead of current to get the files struct since
> >   this is where we get the rlimit from.
> 
> This doesn't seem related to the locking change at all.  Probably
> this patch should be split into three patches, one bugfix per
> patch, unless they are very closely related.

I agree.  Arve, is this all fixing one problem, or multiple ones?  If
multiple ones, we need this split up into multiple patches.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/