[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:26:56 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Enke Chen <enkechen@...co.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Subject: [RFCv7 PATCH 3/4] net/sock.h: use poll_does_not_wait() in sock_poll_wait()
From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
In order to determine whether poll_wait() might actually wait the
poll_table pointer was tested in sock_poll_wait(). This is no longer
sufficient, instead poll_does_not_wait() should be called. That function
also tests whether pt->pq_proc is non-NULL.
Without this change smp_mb() could be called unnecessarily in some
circumstances, causing a performance hit.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 91c1c8b..da7f2ec 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@ static inline bool wq_has_sleeper(struct socket_wq *wq)
static inline void sock_poll_wait(struct file *filp,
wait_queue_head_t *wait_address, poll_table *p)
{
- if (p && wait_address) {
+ if (!poll_does_not_wait(p) && wait_address) {
poll_wait(filp, wait_address, p);
/*
* We need to be sure we are in sync with the
--
1.7.8.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists