linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf: remove deprecated warn_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:04:01 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [PATCH] perf: remove deprecated warn_on_once()


With the new throttling/unthrottling code introduced with
commit e050e3f, we hit two warn_on_once() in:
  - intel_pmu_pebs_enable()
  - intel_pmu_lbr_enable()

The assertions are no longer problematic. There is a valid
path where they can trigger but it is harmless.

The assertion can be triggered with:
  $ perf record -e instructions:pp ....

Leading to paths:

  intel_pmu_pebs_enable
  intel_pmu_enable_event
  x86_perf_event_set_period
  x86_pmu_start
  perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context
  perf_event_task_tick
  scheduler_tick

And:

  intel_pmu_lbr_enable
  intel_pmu_enable_event
  x86_perf_event_set_period
  x86_pmu_start
  perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context.
  perf_event_task_tick
  scheduler_tick

cpuc->enabled is always on because when we get to
perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context() the PMU is not totally
disabled. Furthermore when we need to adjust a period,
we only stop the event we need to change and not the
entire PMU. Thus, when we re-enable, cpuc->enabled is
already set. Note that when we stop the event, both
pebs and lbr are stopped if necessary (and possible).

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 73da6b6..d6bd49f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
 	hwc->config &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT;
 
 	cpuc->pebs_enabled |= 1ULL << hwc->idx;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->enabled);
 
 	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1)
 		intel_pmu_lbr_enable(event);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index 3fab3de..47a7e63 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
 		return;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->enabled);
-
 	/*
 	 * Reset the LBR stack if we changed task context to
 	 * avoid data leaks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/