[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:19:04 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/7] MFD: TWL6040: Add regulator support for VIO, V2V1
supplies
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:59:20PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 03:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That's not a problem for using the bulk get - the array is part of the
> > API so you can use regulator_bulk_get() and still look at individual
> > supplies within the array later on when enabling and disabling them.
> For some reason I have associated the use of regulator_bulk_get with the
> use of regulator_bulk_enable/disable. It did not even crossed my mind
> that I can still use regulator_enable on the individual regulators.
They do normally end up going together since a very large proportion of
devices need all their supplies on when active but don't care about
sequencing so you end up with a common pattern. It's not required,
though.
> Will convert the regulator_get/put to bulk operations. It will make the
> code a bit cleaner.
Good stuff.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists