[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 09:29:00 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
To: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
john.johansen@...onical.com, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
pmoore@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com, djm@...drot.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, segoon@...nwall.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, jmorris@...ei.org, scarybeasts@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, penberg@...helsinki.fi, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
luto@....edu, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
khilman@...com, borislav.petkov@....com, amwang@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
gregkh@...e.de, dhowells@...hat.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, olofj@...omium.org,
mhalcrow@...gle.com, dlaor@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, indan@....nu, mcgrathr@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef
Quoting Will Drewry (wad@...omium.org):
> Replaces the seccomp_t typedef with seccomp_struct to match modern
> kernel style.
(sorry, I'm a bit behind on list)
You were going to switch this to 'struct seccomp' right?
> Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/seccomp.h | 10 ++++++----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 4032ec1..288b5cb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> uid_t loginuid;
> unsigned int sessionid;
> #endif
> - seccomp_t seccomp;
> + struct seccomp_struct seccomp;
>
> /* Thread group tracking */
> u32 parent_exec_id;
> diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
> index cc7a4e9..171ab66 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
> #include <linux/thread_info.h>
> #include <asm/seccomp.h>
>
> -typedef struct { int mode; } seccomp_t;
> +struct seccomp_struct {
> + int mode;
> +};
>
> extern void __secure_computing(int);
> static inline void secure_computing(int this_syscall)
> @@ -19,7 +21,7 @@ static inline void secure_computing(int this_syscall)
> extern long prctl_get_seccomp(void);
> extern long prctl_set_seccomp(unsigned long);
>
> -static inline int seccomp_mode(seccomp_t *s)
> +static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp_struct *s)
> {
> return s->mode;
> }
> @@ -28,7 +30,7 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(seccomp_t *s)
>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
>
> -typedef struct { } seccomp_t;
> +struct seccomp_struct { };
>
> #define secure_computing(x) do { } while (0)
>
> @@ -42,7 +44,7 @@ static inline long prctl_set_seccomp(unsigned long arg2)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static inline int seccomp_mode(seccomp_t *s)
> +static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp_struct *s)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists