linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 12/14] sched: update_cfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:38:27 -0800
From:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 12/14] sched: update_cfs_shares at period edge

Now that our measurement intervals are small (~1ms) we can amortize the posting
of update_shares() to be about each period overflow.  This is a large cost
saving for frequently switching tasks.

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5b6ee7a4..9e2c9a4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1141,6 +1141,7 @@ static void update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int force_update)
 	}
 
 	__update_cfs_rq_tg_load_contrib(cfs_rq, force_update);
+	update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
 }
 
 static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
@@ -1362,9 +1363,8 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 	 * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
 	 */
 	update_curr(cfs_rq);
-	enqueue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
 	account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
-	update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
+	enqueue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
 
 	if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) {
 		place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
@@ -1437,7 +1437,6 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 	 * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
 	 */
 	update_curr(cfs_rq);
-	dequeue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
 
 	update_stats_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
 	if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP) {
@@ -1457,8 +1456,8 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 
 	if (se != cfs_rq->curr)
 		__dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
-	se->on_rq = 0;
 	account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
+	dequeue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
 
 	/*
 	 * Normalize the entity after updating the min_vruntime because the
@@ -1472,7 +1471,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 	return_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq);
 
 	update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
-	update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
+	se->on_rq = 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2488,8 +2487,8 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
 			break;
 
-		update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
 		update_entity_load_avg(se, 1);
+		update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, 0);
 	}
 
 	if (!se) {
@@ -2549,8 +2548,8 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
 			break;
 
-		update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
 		update_entity_load_avg(se, 1);
+		update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, 0);
 	}
 
 	if (!se) {
@@ -5836,8 +5835,11 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_group *tg, unsigned long shares)
 		se = tg->se[i];
 		/* Propagate contribution to hierarchy */
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
-		for_each_sched_entity(se)
+		for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 			update_cfs_shares(group_cfs_rq(se));
+			/* update contribution to parent */
+			update_entity_load_avg(se, 1);
+		}
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
 	}
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/