linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: cache-v7: Disable preemption when reading CCSIDR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:35:59 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: cache-v7: Disable preemption when reading CCSIDR

On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/02/12 17:18, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > If you simply disable/restore IRQs around the critical region then you 
> > don't have to worry about __v7_setup.  Plus this will allow for 
> > v7_flush_dcache_all to still be callable from atomic context.
> 
> Ok. Here's a patch. I still need to test it. I'll send another patch
> series to cleanup the get_thread_info stuff (there's two of them?).
> 
>  arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> index 07c4bc8..654a5fc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
> @@ -54,9 +54,15 @@ loop1:
>  	and	r1, r1, #7			@ mask of the bits for current cache only
>  	cmp	r1, #2				@ see what cache we have at this level
>  	blt	skip				@ skip if no cache, or just i-cache
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> +	save_and_disable_irqs r9		@ make cssr&csidr read atomic
> +#endif
>  	mcr	p15, 2, r10, c0, c0, 0		@ select current cache level in cssr
>  	isb					@ isb to sych the new cssr&csidr
>  	mrc	p15, 1, r1, c0, c0, 0		@ read the new csidr
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> +	restore_irqs r9
> +#endif

I'd suggest using restore_irqs_notrace instead.  The IRQ-off period is 
so small that there is no point tracing it.

Withthat change:

Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/