linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/07] ONKEY: OnKey module for DA9052/53 PMIC v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:32:17 +0530
From:	Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>
To:	<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/07] ONKEY: OnKey module for DA9052/53 PMIC v1

On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 19:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > That doesn't seem to address the concern.  You're setting ret in 
> > > exactly one place and scheduling the work in exactly one place,
> why
> >> are these two things split?
> 
> > schedule_delayed_work() is conditional because it should get invoke 
> > when onkey button is pressed and not when released. For this reason 
> > onkey event is first queried and work is scheduled only when event
> is 
> > present. Now when work is scheduled, onkey event gets queried and
> in 
> > absence of the onkey event work will not get schedule again. By this
> > logic I'm able to simulated the release of the onkey button.
> 
> You're once more completely missing my point.  You've got a
> conditional which detects if the button is pressed in which you set a
> flag which is checked later to see if you should also schedule the
> work.  Since the only thing that ever sets that flag is the button
> being pressed having the flag seems pointless, you may as well just
> schedule  the work instead of setting the flag.
Do you meant to have something like below
if(..) {
} else {
	ret =  ret &  DA9052_EVENTB_ENONKEY;
	input_report_key(.., ret);
	...
	schedule_delayed_work(..);
}
/*
if(ret)
	schedule_delayed_work(..);
*/
but this turns out to be a for ever loop.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/