linux-kernel - Re: clock_getres() and real resolution

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:32:16 -0800
From:	Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@...aro.org>
To:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: clock_getres() and real resolution

On 02/09/2012 10:40 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:

> I thought this list was about Linux kernel development, but now it
> seems to be about Sun's old bugs.

This Sun (probably) has ~100000x more accurate hrtimers than it's said,
and it's a bug. My panda board (with 32K timer enabled) has ~30000x
less accurate hrtimers than it's said, and it's not a bug. Great.

Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/