linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/40] arch: set_current_blocked() and block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:32:20 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] arch: set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

On 02/14, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> This series simplifies the architecture code for handling signals by
> making use of set_current_blocked() introduced in e6fa16ab ("signal:
> sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()") and
> block_sigmask() introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f ("signal: add
> block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked").

Matt, I assume this series was not changed since we discussed it ?

If yes. I do not want to spam lkml, I'll reply to 0/40 only.

All patches look right to me, for the whole series:

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/