linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Perf: bug fix: distinguish between rename and exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:48:33 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>
Cc:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
	Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sonnyrao@...omium.org,
	olofj@...omium.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Perf: bug fix: distinguish between rename and exec

On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 20:56 -0800, Luigi Semenzato wrote:
> This makes it possible for "perf report" to distinguish between an exec and
> a rename (for instance from prctl(PR_SET_NAME)).  Currently a similar COMM
> record is produced for the two events.  Perf report assumes all COMM records
> are execs and discards the old mappings.  Without mappings, perf report
> can no longer correlate sampled IPs to the functions containing them,
> and collapses all samples into a single bucket.
> 
> This change maintains backward compatibility in both directions, i.e. old
> version of perf will continue to work on new perf.data files in the same
> way, and new versions of perf on old data files.
> 
> Another solution would be to not send COMM records for renames.  Although
> it seems reasonable, it might break existing setups.

Uhm, didn't you argue its already broken?

> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ char *get_task_comm(char *buf, struct task_struct *tsk)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_task_comm);
>  
> -void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *buf)
> +void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *buf, bool is_rename)
>  {
>  	task_lock(tsk);
>  
> @@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *buf)
>  	wmb();
>  	strlcpy(tsk->comm, buf, sizeof(tsk->comm));
>  	task_unlock(tsk);
> -	perf_event_comm(tsk);
> +	perf_event_comm(tsk, is_rename);
>  }

I really dislike changing generic code purely for the purpose of
instrumentation like this. Better to pull perf_event_comm() out of here
if you want to change semantics.

Personally I couldn't care less about renames, I think they're a waste
of time, so I'm ok with the simple patch moving the perf_event_comm()
into setup_new_exec() and possibly renaming it to perf_event_exec().

Acme, do you care about renames?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/