linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:27:28 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:58:37 -0500
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com> wrote:

> A common flaw in UEFI systems is a refusal to POST triggered by a malformed
> boot variable. Once in this state, machines may only be restored by
> reflashing their firmware with an external hardware device. While this is
> obviously a firmware bug, the serious nature of the outcome suggests that
> operating systems should filter their variable writes in order to prevent
> a malicious user from rendering the machine unusable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>

Other than pr_err() as a nitpick comemnt this looks good to me

Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/