lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:26:30 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
	Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@...sung.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i387: support lazy restore of FPU state

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> I don't know if unlazy_fpu() being out of line will cause a context
> switch performance loss, though.

unlazy_fpu() is no longer used for context switching - it's only used
for unlazying the FPU.

Part of the whole FP mess is that there were all these *insane*
dependencies where these things were used for different semantic
issues. That's largely fixed now, and things have a single semantic
use.

> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
>
> Let me know if you'd prefer me to pull this into the -tip tree.

Yes, but I'll send you this with a proper commit log. I'll also send
you another patch that splits "<asm/i387.h>" into two.

Right now <asm/i387.h> has two different users: the first of which
"normal kernel use" kind of things (ie kernel_fpu_begin() and friends)
that really don't care about the internals very deeply. But the second
class of user is the actual i387 internal implementation thing that is
used by i387.c and xsave.c etc to actually implement the exposed
interfaces.

As a result, <asm/i387.h> is this mixture of exposed interfaces and
"deep internal knowledge". And as a result, that deep internal
knowledge kind of accidentally gets exposed to code that really
shouldn't be exposed to it.

I have a patch that fixes that. I'll send you a series of two patches
with sign-offs and commentary asap.

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ