linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] x86: Cleanup and simplify cpu-specific data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:22:05 -0400
From:	Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] x86: Cleanup and simplify cpu-specific data

On 24 February 2012 07:47, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> Just a hint for the future: when you're sending multiple versions of
> a patchset, it would be really helpful to have changelog in the 0/n
> message so that the reviewer can know what happened in each version.
> I.e.,
>
> v4:
>        Rediff changes against -rc4
>
> v3:
>        Small cleanups, integrate comments.
>
> etc.
>
> Otherwise, we have to go look at the older patches and compare what
> changed.
>

Yes, of course, I'm sorry.  I've been reading LKML for years...You
would think that when I finally get the chance to contribute I would
have learned something by this time.

-- 
Kevin Winchester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/