linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tty: the briq panel isn't a tty, make it use its own locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:37:17 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: the briq panel isn't a tty, make it use its own
 locking

On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 22:56 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hrm, I don't think anybody maintains it but I do have a BriQ somewhere
> > in storage, so I suppose I could pick it up, not that I need another
> > crap driver to deal with right now though...
> 
> In which case can we just stuff it into the tree, or take the briq driver
> out into staging as this is the last blocker on tackling the tty_lock
> entirely in the tty layer 

Just remove the driver, I don't think anybody cares.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/