linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix move/migrate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:00 -0600 (CST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix move/migrate_pages() race on task struct

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> The problem that I see is that we may race with a suid exec in which
> case the permissions checks might pass for the pre-exec state and then
> we get the post exec mm that we don't actually have permissions for,
> but we manipulate it anyway.

So what? Page migration does not change the behavior of the code. It only
changes the latencies seen. The hacker can mess up the code so that the
suid exec runs slower?

> So we really need to do something silly like get task and
> task->self_exec_id.  Then perform the permission checks and get the mm.
> Then if just before we perform the operation task->self_exec_id is
> different restart the system call, or fail with something like -EAGAIN.

I am still not convinced as to why we would do this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/