linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:10:59 -0800 (PST)
From:	merez@...eaurora.org
To:	"Seungwon Jeon" <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, "'Chris Ball'" <cjb@...top.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "'Maya Erez'" <merez@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5   
        device

> This patch supports packed command of eMMC4.5 device.
> Several reads(or writes) can be grouped in packed command
> and all data of the individual commands can be sent in a
> single transfer on the bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/card/block.c   |  496
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/mmc/card/queue.c   |   48 ++++-
>  drivers/mmc/card/queue.h   |   13 ++
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c |    1 +
>  include/linux/mmc/core.h   |    4 +
>  5 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
Hi,

We ran performance tests on the packed commands patch. We found out that
enabling the read packing didn't improve the performance in any of the
scenarios we ran (see the detailed results below).
Therefore, we suggest to move the read packing code to a different patch
and approve only the write packing code for now. The read packing adds
complexity to the code and we don't see a point in adding it while the
intention is to disable it.

Test results:

Long read operation:
----------------------
no-packing: 39.5 MB/s
packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 39.5 MB/s
packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 39.5 MB/s

Several parallel read operations (sum of all the read throughputs):
---------------------------
no-packing: 42.6 MB/s
packed commands patch(both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 38 MB/s
packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 38.2 MB/s

Parallel long read and long write operations (read throughput):
-----------------------------------------------------------------
no-packing: 23.8 MB/s
packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 12.6 MB/s
packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 12.5 MB/s

Parallel short read and long write operations (read throughput):
-----------------------------------------------------------------
no-packing: 22.9 MB/s
packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 8.4 MB/s
packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 8.6 MB/s

Several Parallel short read and short write operations (sum of all the
read throughputs):
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
no-packing: 41.6 MB/s
packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 35 MB/s
packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 36 MB/s

Thanks,
Maya Erez
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/