linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Fix task_nommu build regression in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:01:15 +0530
From:	Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Fix task_nommu build regression in linux-next

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Mar 2012 01:46:33 +0530
> Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Commit b7b2a0afacada237005068294cb0ccc49d32889e resulted in a build
>> failure for nommu builds:
>
> Bare git commit IDs aren't very useful, because the ID of a patch can
> be different in different trees.  And in linux-next, the ID of a patch
> can change over time.  This is why we like to refer to commits using the
> formulation b7b2a0afacad ("procfs: mark thread stack correctly in
> proc/<pid>/maps").

Thanks, I'll keep this in mind.


-- 
Siddhesh Poyarekar
http://siddhesh.in
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/