lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:14:36 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>
CC:	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, mina86@...a86.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	workgroup.linux@....com, Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper
 to test CMA

On 03/07/2012 11:14 AM, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song<Baohua.Song@....com>
>
> Any write request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to allocate memory from
> CMA, for example:
>
> 1st time
> $ echo 1024>  /dev/cma_test
> will require cma_test to request 1MB(1024KB)
> 2nd time
> $ echo 2048>  /dev/cma_test
> will require cma_test to request 2MB(2048KB)
>
> Any read request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to free the 1st valid
> memory from CMA, for example:
>
> 1st time
> $ cat /dev/cma_test
> will require cma_test to free the 1MB allocated in the first write request
> 2nd time
> $ cat /dev/cma_test
> will require cma_test to free the 2MB allocated in the second write request

Any reason why using /dev not /proc or /sys?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ