linux-kernel - Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1466!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:52:11 +0100
From:	David Sterba <dave@...os.cz>
To:	Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, josef@...hat.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1466!

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:10:45PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
> kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1466!

1461         ret = btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata(trans, root, item);
1462         /*
1463          * we have reserved enough space when we start a new transaction,
1464          * so reserving metadata failure is impossible.
1465          */
1466         BUG_ON(ret);

> RAX: 00000000ffffffe4

ENOSPC

>  [<ffffffffa03210e5>] ? __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x172/0x25e [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa032158c>] ? btrfs_rename+0x38b/0x55b [btrfs]

rename reserves 20 blocks, but seems that's not enough.  I've never seen
a crash report in rename, and according to the stacktrace there's
nothing suspicious (like selinux related).


david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/