linux-kernel - Re: [regression] Re: [PATCH 2/3] futex: Sanitize cmpxchg_futex_value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2012 22:12:14 +0100
From:	Émeric Maschino <emeric.maschino@...il.com>
To:	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Patrick Baggett <baggett.patrick@...il.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] Re: [PATCH 2/3] futex: Sanitize cmpxchg_futex_value_locked
 API

Oops, just to correct myself: the tests described below DON'T return
gracefully with kernel 3.2. Sorry for the mistake.

     Emeric


Le 8 mars 2012 21:59, Émeric Maschino <emeric.maschino@...il.com> a écrit :
> ERROR: No such process: FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI failed
>
> For memories, this test passed successfully with 2.6.38-rc8+, with AND
> without 37a9d912b24f included.
>
> Now, adding locked argument, I'm getting:
>
> ERROR: Function not implemented: FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI failed
>
> Huh? Both these tests nevertheless gracefully return with kernel 3.2,
> while the second test enters in an unfinite loop with buggy
> 2.6.38-rc8+.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/