linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:51:31 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
Cc:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm tree

Hi Mikey,

On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org> wrote:
>
> Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ.  
> 
> In fact, keeping MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to make SPARSE_IRQ user
> selectable, which we don't want anymore since ad5b7f1350c2.

Yes, indeed. I will fix up the merge resolution for tomorrow.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped