linux-kernel - Re: TTY: tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:15:32 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: TTY: tty_port questions

On 12.03.2012 11:53, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Another question, what is the purpose of tty_port->console?
>> It seems to have no user.
>
> So the tty_port layer can in future know about whether it is a console
> without a tty necessarily being present or referenceable.
>
>> Is tty_port really the right thing for a console driver like in the UML
>> case?
>
> It will be. In order to fix the tty locking mess we need to shove a lot
> of stuff whose lifetime is the lifetime of the physical port somewhere
> else - the tty_port is that structure.
>

"It will be" in terms of "not now"? ;-)

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/