linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] dmaengine: add a slave parameter to __dma_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:47:27 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] dmaengine: add a slave parameter to __dma_request_channel()

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 13:20 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> It can be made to work as long as there's only one DMAC group with
>> configurable channels and all other DMACs are dedicated to specific
>> peripherals, yes. I don't know whether there are already now or are
>> approaching any platforms with multiple reconfigurable groups.
>
> And that is what I am talking about.
>
> Having specific channel mapping given by platform for all channels which
> are to be used dedicated. And a pool of channels which can be used by
> anyone (if they can be) on a platform.
>
> Does this proposal sound good for others as well.

It sounds good to me.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/