linux-kernel - Re: build failure in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:07:08 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: build failure in linux-next

[Cc: akpm]

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:59:34 +0100 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:36:14AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > I'm seeing a build failure in linux-next:
> > 
> >   CC      init/main.o
> > In file included from /es/linux/linux-next/arch/c6x/include/asm/pgtable.h:76:0,
> >                  from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/mm.h:44,
> >                  from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/ring_buffer.h:5,
> >                  from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/ftrace_event.h:4,
> >                  from /es/linux/linux-next/include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> >                  from /es/linux/linux-next/include/linux/syscalls.h:78,
> >                  from /es/linux/linux-next/init/main.c:16:
> > /es/linux/linux-next/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h: In function 'pmd_none_or_trans_huge_or_clear_bad':
> > /es/linux/linux-next/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h:476:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmd_clear_bad' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 
> > 
> > This patch added some functions to asm-generic/pgtable.h which should
> > have been placed in the CONFIG_MMU conditional block:
> > 
> >   Author: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> >   Date:   Wed Mar 21 10:48:00 2012 +1100
> > 
> >       mm: thp: fix pmd_bad() triggering in code paths holding mmap_sem read mode
> > 
> > 
> > The following patch fixes the build problem for me:
> 
> Thanks for noticing this problem.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> > index 202c010..8ba3ba5 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> > @@ -342,6 +342,64 @@ static inline void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >  	__ptep_modify_prot_commit(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
> >  }
> >  #endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_MODIFY_PROT_TRANSACTION */
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This function is meant to be used by sites walking pagetables with
> > + * the mmap_sem hold in read mode to protect against MADV_DONTNEED and
> > + * transhuge page faults. MADV_DONTNEED can convert a transhuge pmd
> > + * into a null pmd and the transhuge page fault can convert a null pmd
> > + * into an hugepmd or into a regular pmd (if the hugepage allocation
> > + * fails). While holding the mmap_sem in read mode the pmd becomes
> > + * stable and stops changing under us only if it's not null and not a
> > + * transhuge pmd. When those races occurs and this function makes a
> > + * difference vs the standard pmd_none_or_clear_bad, the result is
> > + * undefined so behaving like if the pmd was none is safe (because it
> > + * can return none anyway). The compiler level barrier() is critically
> > + * important to compute the two checks atomically on the same pmdval.
> > + */
> > +static inline int pmd_none_or_trans_huge_or_clear_bad(pmd_t *pmd)
> > +{
> > +	/* depend on compiler for an atomic pmd read */
> > +	pmd_t pmdval = *pmd;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The barrier will stabilize the pmdval in a register or on
> > +	 * the stack so that it will stop changing under the code.
> > +	 */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > +	barrier();
> > +#endif
> > +	if (pmd_none(pmdval))
> > +		return 1;
> > +	if (unlikely(pmd_bad(pmdval))) {
> > +		if (!pmd_trans_huge(pmdval))
> > +			pmd_clear_bad(pmd);
> 
> Problem is, this fixes MMU=n but it'll break x86 with MMU=y and THP=n.
> 
> These functions shall be placed after pmd_trans_huge you see at the
> end of asm-generic/pgtable.h .
> 
> The simplest fix is that you add #ifdef CONFIG_MMU around it instead
> of moving (I guess you can keep pmd_trans_huge and the rest at the end
> of the file inside CONFIG_MMU too as it shall never be called as it
> all takes pmds/ptes as parameter).
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrea

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped