| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 02:46:31 +0100 From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: On patch "Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h" Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote: > It's not a problem; they now get barrier.h via spinlock.h. I just > wondered whether absence of #include <asm/barrier.h> in those files had a > deeper non-obvious meaning. Since it doesn't I will just put that include > in them next time around when I do some housekeeping there. I suspect they should #include asm/barrier.h directly rather than relying on spinlock.h. There's no guarantee that on every arch spinlock.h will pull in asm/barrier.h, I think... David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists