[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:49:26 -0400
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 13:07, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com> wrote:
> Umm... I'm sorry. I haven't catch why OOM is related topic. Could you please
> elaborate more?
With fork you always have some copy-on-write (and worse for
overcommit) just to then execute exec. With a real spawn
implementation you wouldn't have that. A big problem if you, for
instance, have to spawn a small helper from a gigantic process.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists