lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:33:04 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...badil.infradead.org>
Cc:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...jolero.org>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lf_driver_backport@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] compat: add some tracing backport work

On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 06:00 -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> I've managed to backport tracing it seems, even when CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
> is enabled.

Nope, you've managed to completely kill tracing.


> +#undef __DECLARE_TRACE
> +#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
> +	static inline void trace_##name(proto)				\
> +	{ }								\
> +	static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto)		\
> +	{ }								\
> +	static inline int						\
> +	register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto))			\
> +	{								\
> +		return -ENOSYS;						\
> +	}								\
> +	static inline void						\
> +	unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto))			\
> +	{								\
> +		return -ENOSYS;						\
> +	}								\
> +	static inline void check_trace_callback_type_##name(void (*cb)(data_proto)) \
> +	{								\
> +	}

All of this simply completely kills tracing. Worse, the tracepoints get
registered, but their trace_##name functions do nothing, so you can
think that they're there, but they never record data ...

The old way was much better. Can we just let 2.6.24 and the other
ancients die in peace?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ