linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Use correct byte-sized register constraint in __xchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:27:26 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@...base.at>,
	leigh123linux@...glemail.com, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct byte-sized register constraint in __xchg_op()

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>> x86-64 can access the low half of any register, but i386 can only do
>> it with a subset of registers.  'r' causes compilation failures on i386,
>> but 'q' expresses the constraint properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
>> Reported-by: Leigh Scott <leigh123linux@...glemail.com>
>> Tested-by: Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@...base.at>
>
> This should be CC'd to stable, given the bug shows up in 3.3, right?

Er.. this patch seems to have been lost in limbo.  Is anyone following
up on it?

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/