linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] regulator: Convert rc5t583 to set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:31:44 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] regulator: Convert rc5t583 to set_voltage

On Thursday 05 April 2012 11:37 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
> Not every regulator driver should implement set_voltage_sel callback.
> See commit e8eef82
> "regulator: Provide a selector based set_voltage_sel() operation".
>
> For rc5t583, the regulator voltage can be mapped onto selector values with a
> simple calculation, thus implement set_voltage is better than set_voltage_sel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin<axel.lin@...il.com>
> ---


I wanted to provide the settling delay whenever voltage output get 
change as per datasheet. In place of having this delay in the driver, I 
wanted to use implementation of core and for this I need to implement 
set_voltage_sel() not set_voltage().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/