lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:56:11 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com>
To:	<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/7] xen/setup: Make dom0_mem=XGB
 behavior be similar to classic Xen kernels.

>>> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> 04/06/12 11:04 PM >>>
>> With your new behaviour it will no longer possible to specify an
>> unlimited balloon but a limited number of initial pages.  This is
>> behaviour that Jan said he used.
>
>I am not sure I see the problem - I mean if one uses:
>
>dom0_mem=min:8G,max:16G
>
>I understand that we want to start at 8GB and if the user
>choose to - balloon up to 16GB.
>
>But doing this:
>
>dom0_mem=8G
>
>and allocating pagetables up to .. say 32GB, seems counter-intuive
>as the effect is similar to having no 'dom0_mem' except that the initial
>size is smaller.

What's counter intuitive here? There may not be a need - from the perspective
of the kernel - for a hard upper limit enforced by Xen (i.e. the pseudo infinity
we have right now may be quite fine).

Anyway, as said in the other reply already - unless this is to address a bug, I
don't see the point in changing behavior that has been that way for a pretty
long time.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ